Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1354

reference
982-tree-1
name
1354
tree-preservation-order

undefined

982-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.009621 50.852689)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.009551 50.852682,-1.009554 50.852695,-1.009564 50.852708,-1.009579 50.852718,-1.009599 50.852725,-1.009621 50.852727,-1.009643 50.852725,-1.009663 50.852719,-1.009678 50.852709,-1.009689 50.852697,-1.009693 50.852683,-1.009689 50.852669,-1.009680 50.852656,-1.009664 50.852646,-1.009644 50.852640,-1.009622 50.852637,-1.009600 50.852639,-1.009581 50.852645,-1.009565 50.852655,-1.009554 50.852668,-1.009551 50.852682)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL